Caution: the following includes an artist with a serious case of “a bad workman blames his tools” syndrome.
As an artist who strives to get animals as accurate as I possibly can,
going off-photo goes against all my principals.
Funnily enough, it is only when I perceive the photograph to be “wrong” that painting stops being a lovely relaxing experience that comes naturally to me.
Instead, it can instantly become stressful, and I can be heard muttering “hate this stupid dog / eye / leg / insert anything here”.
It’s at that point that I know that a quick fix is not possible. The photograph looks all wrong, and to avoid my painting looking all wrong, I have to go off book, or find a new bit of photograph to copy.
Look at his lovely face, fluffy ears and glinty eyes.
Awww. That makes for a lovely relaxing painting session, with a hint of a challenge.
Now scroll back up and look at those legs.
What the heck is going on there???
They are all over the place!
Paws are conveniently cropped out of the image, so I can’t really even work out what is back leg and front leg, what is body and what is tail.
I am left stumped as to what is going on and to how on earth I will paint this random assortment of white limbs.
So I painted it as per the photograph.
And as expected, it looked all wrong.
My own mother gave herself the role of “Quality Control” and told me I needed to change it.
I love painting, but I don’t love repainting a painting that I thought was a finished painting.
Back to the drawing board!!